As Chair of the Parental Rights in Education Defense Fund, we were one of the presenters at the press conference held by the Coalition to Support Motion 312, on August 27, 2012, in Markham, Ontario. Everyday for Life Canada posts the entire speech in this entry. The Coalition consists of a number of community groups who want the government to pass the motion and re-examine the definition of human life in Canada. Here is the motion proposed in the current Parliament by Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth:
Here's the speech:
"That a special committee of the House be appointed and directed to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth and to answer the questions hereinafter set forth."
We should all support the
motion 312 put forward by MP Stephen Woodworth to re-define the meaning of the human person in Canada. Too many
important social issues have been wrongly politicized in Canada. Abortion,
same-sex marriage and the very meaning of a person are just a few of them. A
little history will help here. It was only a generation or so ago during the
mid 1960s that most new parents in Canada were given a book called,
The Canadian Mother and Child to help them with child rearing. The inside cover
had the name of the then Minister of Health and Welfare, John Munro.
It’s important to remind
ourselves of this because in that book which written by Doctor Ernest Couture,
for the government, the beginning of human life is unquestionably assumed if not
directly defined. The book makes it clear that when the word fetus is
mentioned the new parents are to think of the word baby or child.
So, at the time, the government
treated the unborn baby or child, as a person with rights and abortion
was a criminal act. Today most politicians don’t even want to discuss the idea,
let alone have a law that will put restrictions on abortion. Pro-choice
advocates have strongly opposed MP Stephen Woodworth’s motion because they
believe the issue is closed. For them “a child becomes a human being” only at
birth. Any other definition may restrict abortion and they don’t want this.
The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) has recently adopted the wrong position telling MPs not to
support the motion. They are more worried about protecting doctors from any
possible criminal activity than about scientific, moral and common- sense truth
that life does begin at conception
and that a pregnant woman is carrying a child.
The CMA has its head
buried in political sand because scientifically, biologically and genetically each
new, unique human life begins at conception, not at birth. Everything that the
new human life will become is present at the moment of conception. The current
law has created the false legal/political notion that life begins at birth.
However, both common law and the Criminal Code have always protected both the
mother and child. It was in 1969 that the law was changed and decriminalized in the Morgentaler case; it was done to
protect a woman’s constitutional right, hijacked from the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, for the “security of the person.”
The Criminal Code, before
the Morgentaler case gave legal protection to the child up to birth and the homicide provisions after birth. Today we operate with a law of omission and no
restrictions on abortion. But even the CMA believes that an abortion after 20
weeks of gestation is ethically wrong. A baby at that stage suffers pain when
we intentionally crush it to death. We don’t need science to tell us this, even
though we do have the ultra sound
evidence for this….Remember the film, The Silent Scream by former abortionist Dr. Bernard
Nathanson! We all know that abortion is morally wrong….especially from the
point of view of the child waiting to be born!
But our current law allows
for this and that is why we need a discussion on the issue, even if the
majority of MPs, the CMA, pro-choice groups and our Prime Minister say they think
otherwise, although we suspect that many do agree with us! In a true democracy there must be room
for debate and for change when the facts, the science and the ethics point in a
different direction.
Incredibly more than
100,000 abortions are performed in Canada each year! We should be
asking the question about the protection of human life and the easy
availability and thus the encouragement and promotion of abortion in Canada. We strongly urge you to support Stephen Woodworth’s motion. Write to your MP, the other MPs and the Prime Minister.
A country that is afraid to discuss the safety and well-being of its future
citizens risks its very survival by killing its own people even before they are
born. Let’s build a culture of life and not the culture of death.

Jesus says in scripture what you did for the least of my children you did unto me. Right now over one hundred thousand unborn babies are killed every year by abortion in Canada.
ReplyDeleteIn the end Almighty God will judge our society and civilization by how we treated the unborn. We are quite literally aborting our future through abortions. It's time mankind comes to it senses and save our future generations. Stop abortion now!
I share this email from a reader and post it with his permission. Thank you Dave for taking a stand on this important life issue and sending it to 58 other people.
ReplyDeleteDear Prime Minister,
I am both shocked and disappointed.
There are reports you do not support Bill M-312.
We are aware that your (academic) qualification(s?) are in economics ... but surely there is some elementary knowledge of science?
In particular there is no reputable scientist who does not acknowledge that a new human begins its existence at the moment of conception.
The idea that babies only become human beings when they leave the womb and begin to breathe is ridiculous:
- a premature baby delivered by C-section is a human being?
- but a baby in the womb at the same stage of development is not?
How silly is that?
The idea that babies only become human beings when they leave the womb and begin to breathe is from the dark ages. You do not want intelligent Canadians to believe that that is where your scientific knowledge resides, do you?
Come, come: 2012, we're in the 21st century ... aren't we?
Do you lead the Progressive Conservatives or the Regressive Conservatives?
Respectfully,
David A. Hogg B.Sc., D.I.C., P.Eng., C.G.A.